---
title: "Grok 4.1"
type: model
id: "grok-4.1"
provider: "xAI"
model_type: "proprietary"
release_date: "2025-11"
description: "xAI's flagship model with 65% fewer hallucinations than its predecessor (down to 4.22%). Available in both Thinking and Non-thinking configurations."
last_updated: "2026-04-10"
context_window: "128K tokens"
website: "https://x.ai"
license: "Proprietary"
modality:
- "text"
- "image"
tags:
- "xai"
- "proprietary"
- "text"
- "image"
pricing:
input: "$3.00 / 1M tokens"
output: "$15.00 / 1M tokens"
note: "Available via xAI API"
benchmarks:
reasoning: 91
coding: 90
math: 91
writing: 87
multilingual: 80
speed: 76
best_for:
- "Current events analysis"
- "Technical reasoning"
- "Coding tasks"
- "Social media analysis"
---
# Grok 4.1
A strong all-rounder that stands out for one specific thing: real-time X/Twitter data access. If your use case involves current events, social media analysis, or anything requiring live information, Grok 4.1 has a built-in advantage that no other model matches without external tooling.
The benchmark profile is competitive -- 91/100 reasoning, 90/100 coding, 91/100 math -- putting it in the same tier as Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Gemini 3.1 Pro. The 65% hallucination reduction down to a 4.22% rate is a meaningful improvement, though Grok 4.20 has since pushed factual accuracy even further. At $3/$15 per million tokens, the pricing sits right between Gemini 3.1 Pro and GPT-5.4.
The 128K context window is the main limitation -- in a world where Claude, GPT-5.4, and Gemini all offer 1M tokens, Grok's context feels cramped for long-document work. The ecosystem is also thinner: fewer third-party integrations, less community tooling, and full access still requires a SuperGrok subscription.
**When to pick something else:** For coding, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or Opus 4.6 are better at the same or lower price. For general reasoning on a budget, Gemini 3.1 Pro offers similar scores at $2/$12. Grok 4.1's real niche is live data and X platform integration -- if that's not your use case, the other frontier models offer more for less.
Grok 4.1
A strong all-rounder that stands out for one specific thing: real-time X/Twitter data access. If your use case involves current events, social media analysis, or anything requiring live information, Grok 4.1 has a built-in advantage that no other model matches without external tooling.
The benchmark profile is competitive -- 91/100 reasoning, 90/100 coding, 91/100 math -- putting it in the same tier as Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Gemini 3.1 Pro. The 65% hallucination reduction down to a 4.22% rate is a meaningful improvement, though Grok 4.20 has since pushed factual accuracy even further. At $3/$15 per million tokens, the pricing sits right between Gemini 3.1 Pro and GPT-5.4.
The 128K context window is the main limitation -- in a world where Claude, GPT-5.4, and Gemini all offer 1M tokens, Grok's context feels cramped for long-document work. The ecosystem is also thinner: fewer third-party integrations, less community tooling, and full access still requires a SuperGrok subscription.
When to pick something else: For coding, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or Opus 4.6 are better at the same or lower price. For general reasoning on a budget, Gemini 3.1 Pro offers similar scores at $2/$12. Grok 4.1's real niche is live data and X platform integration -- if that's not your use case, the other frontier models offer more for less.